The following are the highlights of the Illinois LNP Steering
Committee meeting held on Thursday, November 20, 1997.
Notes Overview:
---------------------
1. Subcommittee Reports
2. St. Louis MSA
3. Regulatory Update
Highlights:
----------
** NPAC sub-committee is near completion of number pooling
requirements (pre-porting and snapback). Requirements are on
www.ported.com website.
** RFP for interim number pooling administrator is out.
1) Subcommittee Reports
a) Cost Recovery -
The FCC may release a cost recovery decision in December;
however, it is believed that this decision will cover only 20% of the
issue. The remaining 80% will be handed back to the States.
Until a cost recovery mechanism is finalized (from either the ICC
or FCC), Ameritech stated that they will not allow any subscribers
to port.
b) NPAC Update -
Testing is now complete and it appears that the NPAC is ready. A
plan is in place to improve its performance. Initial pooling
requirements have been completed and include:
- pre-porting
- snap back to block holder.
There was no push back from any of the Chicago Service providers
on these issues.
The NPAC will have a special release for pooling, which will come
out before rel. 2.0. This special release won't be ready until at
least May 15th with the mechanized part ready by June. In order
to meet the May 15th timeline, requirements must be finalized by
January 15,
As of Nov. 20th, there have been 0 ports in the mid-Atlantic
region.
c) Number Pooling
Issue: Cost Recovery - Who handles it?
Resolution - Interim mechanisms to be reviewed by subcommittee
RFP
12/2 - Questions due
12/5 - Number administration conference call
12/16 - Responses due
New test start target date of 4/1/98.
4/1/98 - 6/1/98 using manual work arounds.
6/1/98 - automated number pooling ready
New 847 exhaust date moved back due to code utilization slowing down.
d) LLC -
Contract for Lockheed Martin approved.
1/1/98 interim cost allocation mechanism approved.
There are some issues with the LLC cost allocation mechanism as AT&T is seeing figures that they did not expect when they agreed to the selected cost allocation mechanism. A number of the other members of the LLC are also not happy with these figures. The Midwest is using the same LLC agreement as is used in Maryland.
Pricing of Release 2.0 to be discussed at 1p meeting.
e) Operator Services -
Nothing new to report.
f) Rating and Billing -
Nothing new to report.
g) LNP SCP -
The subcommittee supports the following positions for number
pooling:
- pre-porting
- explicit range capability
T1S1 will be taking over national issues for porting, but not pooling.
g) LNP SSP -
The vendors were asked in the Oct. 23rd meeting to respond to
whether they would require an LRN per rate center. The responses
are outlined below:
Ericsson - No.
Nortel - No (with patch not yet available).
Siemens - Yes.
Lucent - No for the 5E and 4E, Yes for the 1A.
AGCS - No response. Sam Mehta will check.
This issue is only a problem when separate EAS routes are needed. This is not a problem in Chicago.
h) Phase II -
NANC has released new documentation, some of which contain
phase II requirements for switches.
i) Test Team -
Nothing new to report.
j) Operations -
The subcommittee reviewed and agrees with the NPAC
operations flows for number pooling (on www.ported.com).
However, the sub-committee identified some changes to current
processes (i.e. how to open NPA-NXXs, disconnects) that will have
to be made to handle number pooling. For example, currently when
an NXX is opened, it will be made LNP capable when a number is
actually ported. However, with number pooling, the instant a
thousands group is opened the entire NPA-NXX is opened even if
nobody has ported. These process impacts will only be for the 847
area code (847 is the only area code that will have number pooling).
It was mentioned that some vendors have problems with rel. 26
and 'unallocated' treatment. The issue revolves around a number
that is unallocated but assigned. This has an impact on both
number porting and pooling.
Ameritech stated that they will work with competitors (for the
time being) when a mass calling number is ported.
NexLink will soon be entering the Chicago market.
k) 911 Subcommittee -
Ameritech described a meeting with law enforcement agencies
to discuss IVR issues for the agencies and 911 providers. The law enforcement agencies believe that IVR will initially meet their needs, but they want more(i.e. want a single giant national database). Overall the law enforcement agencies were satisfied with IVR; however, they are
not willing to pay for IVR as they believe that it fixes something
that was broken by the service providers, not themselves. IVR will
be ready by March if LLC approves.
l) Number Pooling -
An RFP has been issued for an interim number pooling
administrator (a copy of the RFP is available on www.ported.com).
Currently 4 parties have expressed interest. The carrier members
of the number pooling sub-committee will select the administrator,
the LLC will not be involved in the selection. They are hoping to
have an interim administrator by February 1st.
A new exhaust date for the 847 area code was announced. 847
is now expected to be exhausted in 2Q99, which is a year longer
then previously forecast. This revised date is mainly due to a slow
down in 847-NXX assignments which occurred when the area code
was placed in jeopardy. It is thought that number pooling will
delay the exhaust date by another 4 years (i.e. 2Q03).
Ameritech stated that they believe that a cost recovery
mechanism for number pooling is needed that is separate from LNP
cost recovery.
2) St. Louis MSA -
The selected St. Louis sites will be placed on www.ported.com.
Except for 3 GTE switches, all the selected switches belong to
Ameritech. The ICC Staff suggested that 911 testing should also be done
in St. Louis as the Southern Illinois PSAP vendors are not yet familiar
with LNP.
3) Regulatory -
Ameritech has filed 2 tariffs. One of them deals with an end-
user surcharge to pay for LNP (39 cents for all users); however, this
tariff was denied. The second tariff deals with an LNP query charge
which would be applied to any calls where Ameritech launches an
LNP query for another provider. This has been allowed but the
rates are expected to be investigated.
Ameritech stated that it will wait to implement LNP until after a
cost recovery scheme has been outlined. This applies to all the
MSAs within Ameritech's region (including Chicago, Detroit and Cleveland). Ameritech believes that cost recovery could delay LNP
implementation until 2Q98.
A number pooling NXX allocation plan is being discussed where
new NPA-NXXs will only be allowed if 75% of 847 codes are 75%
filled and their 1000's blocks are 90% filled. It is claimed that this
process will extend 847's life by 6 years and 1 month. There may
still be another 40 to 50 carriers who will enter the Chicago market
over the next couple of years.
The FCC has a subcommittee dealing with NANC to cover number
pooling. NANC and INC are both discussing number pooling. INC will
recommend pre-porting vs. post, snapback and the level of contamination within blocks.
New York may be the next State to release a number pooling
administrator RFP.
----------------------------------------------------------------
The next meeting of the ICC LNP Steering Committee will be held on
Dec. 18, 1997.