NORTHEAST
CARRIER ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC
NEW YORK
Interim Number Pooling Administrator
Request For Proposal
March 3, 1998
1.0 General Information 2
1.1.2 Use of RFP Information 2
1.1.3 Vendor's Information 2
1.2 Impact of Federal Regulation and Legislation on this Procurement 3
1.3 Eligibility to Submit Proposals 3
1.3.1 Neutral Third Party 3
1.3.2 Additional Qualifications 4
1.4 Preparation of Responses 5
1.4.1 Proposal Submission 5
1.4.2 Closing Date 7
1.4.3 Response Composition 7
1.4.4 Questions or Requests for Additional Information 8
1.4.5 Acceptance Period 8
1.4.6 Contract Award 8
1.5 Additional Contractual Terms and Conditions 10
1.6 Preparation of Proposal Response 11
1.6.1 Content Structure 11
1.6.2 Tab Content 11
2.0 Overview of thousands block (NXX-X) pooling 13
3.0 GENERAL Responsibilities 14
4.0 Miscellaneous Requirements 14
4.2 Communications Requirements 14
ATTACHMENT- New york interim NUMBER POOLING thousands block (nxx-x) ASsignment guidelines
1.1.1 Purpose of Request for Proposal
The Northeast Carrier Acquisition Company, LLC (NECAC, LLC) will evaluate all proposals from an overall numbering administration and operations perspective to ensure integration with existing code administration and number portability operating procedures; and they will act as the Selection Committee. There is no representation that the selection of an interim Number Pooling Administrator using this RFP will have any bearing on any potential future selection of a long-term Number Pooling Administrator.
Prior to the award of business, prospective vendors may be required to furnish process flows and/or components of their systems to the NECAC, LLC for evaluation and testing and/or to make arrangements on their own premises for facilitating joint testing, at no charge.
1.2 Impact of Federal Regulation and Legislation on this Procurement
This RFP is being issued by the Northeast Carrier Acquisition Company, LLC, the members of which currently provide or intend to provide facilities-based local exchange services in the state of New York. Number Administration is subject to oversight by the New York Public Service Commission (NYPSC). Accordingly, Bidders should be aware that Directives from the NYPSC, as well as congressional legislation, Federal Communications Commission rule making, or other regulatory mandates, may establish policies for number administration and pooling which may affect the decisions of the NECAC, LLC and the activities or systems of the vendor. This RFP requests bids for an interim pooling administrator to function until a long term pooling administrator is selected. The selection of the long term pooling administrator is currently anticipated to occur as early as second quarter 1999.
1.3 Eligibility to Submit Proposals
2) a Bidder and any affiliate thereof may not issue a majority of its debt to, nor may it derive a majority of its revenues from any telecommunications service provider. "Majority" shall mean greater than 50 percent, and "debt" shall mean stocks, bonds, securities, notes, loans or any other instrument of indebtedness; and
3) notwithstanding the Neutrality Criteria set forth in 1) and 2) above, a Bidder may be determined to be or not to be subject to undue influence by parties with a vested interest in the outcome of numbering administration and activities. The NECAC, LLC may conduct an evaluation to determine whether a Bidder meets the undue influence criterion.
In addition, the Selection Committee may request and consider additional information from the Bidder for purposes of applying the Neutrality Criteria. A Bidder's compliance with these Neutrality Criteria must be demonstrated to be underway, as evidenced by the Bidder's submittal with its response to this requirements document (i) a written agreement of principles, and (ii) a majority of closing documents, both of which pertain to a transaction or other action that will bring a Bidder into compliance with the Neutrality Criteria. Any Bidder seeking to demonstrate that compliance is underway under the terms of this subsection shall be required to submit a written plan, as part of its response to this Requirements Document, detailing how it will comply with these Neutrality Criteria.
Any subcontractor(s) that performs (1) interim number pooling functions must also meet the neutrality requirements described above.
1.3.2 Additional Qualifications
RFP responses shall contain a concise description of the principal business of the Bidder and any subcontractors, including such items as company background, characteristics of business strength, accomplishments and capabilities which demonstrate a strong foundation for managing and administering NANP resources, policies and procedures that will ensure evenhanded treatment of all carriers, and certification that the Bidder and any subcontractor shall comply with the provisions of Section 1.3
1.3.2.2 Industry Experience
RFP proposals shall include a concise description of the telecommunications experience of the Bidder and any subcontractors, including such items as products and services offered, customers served, successful performance of the functional skills required by this RFP on activities performed for other customers, and customer benefits that resulted from such successful performance.
1.3.2.3 Financial Stability
RFP proposals shall include a concise description of the financial condition of the Bidder and any subcontractors. Responses should include the most recent annual report or audited financial statement of the Bidder and any subcontractors.
AT&T
3033 Chain Bridge Road - B260
Oakton, VA 22185
>>Send one not marked (or more as indicated) complete set(s) to the addressees below:
Stephen Addicks
8521 Leesburg Pike
Vienna, VA 22182
email id: stephen.addicks@mci.com
NY-PSC (3 sets)
Tom Burke
3 Empire State Plaza
Albany, NY 12223
email id: tjb@dps.state.ny.us
Bell Atlantic
Josephine A. Gallagher
1310 N. Court House Road - 3rd Floor
Arlington, VA 22201
email id: josehpine.a.gallagher@bellatlantic.com
Josephine A. Gallagher
8774 Doves Fly Way
Laurel, MD 20723
email id: josehpine.a.gallagher@bellatlantic.com
TCG
Fred Cederqzist
1 Teleport Drive - Suite 301
Staten Island, NY 10311
email id: cederqf@tcg.com
Bell Atlantic
Beth Gunter
1 East Pratt Street
Floor 3E-11
Baltimore, MD 21202
email id: beth.a.gunter@bellatlantic.com
Time Warner Communications
Rochelle Jones
300 First Stamford Place
Stamford, CT 06902-6732
email id: rochelle38@aol.com
Cablevision Lightpath
Leo Maese
111 New South Road
Hicksville, NY 11801
email id: lmaese@cablevision.com
Bell Atlantic
Derek Noppenberger
1 East Pratt Street
Floor 3E-11
Baltimore, MD 21202
email id: derek.j.noppenberger@bellatlantic.com
Bell Atlantic
Laura Pierpont
1 East Pratt Street
Floor 3E-11
Baltimore, MD 21202
email id: laura.b.pierpont@bellatlantic.com
Your cover letter should include the name(s), phone number(s) and fax number(s) of the individual(s) within your company who should be contacted in case any questions should arise during the evaluation of your proposal.
Failure to deliver your response to the addresses given above by 12 N (Eastern Time) of the closing date, April 13, 1998, may result in the disqualification of your proposal.
The package containing your proposal shall be marked "Sealed Proposal" with this RFP title and your company's name.
all pages of one (1) paper copy "Master Copy" and forward that copy to Mary Ensminger. If discrepancies between copies and/or the diskette are found, the "Master Copy" will govern.
Your proposal shall be typed double spaced on 8-1/2" x 11" 3-hole punched paper with each volume beginning on a new page and separately tabbed.
You are requested not to make your proposal elaborate with respect to binding or presentation. A simple, straightforward, economically reproduced proposal is strongly recommended. Our proposal evaluation procedure places a higher premium on thoroughness of presentation, i.e., responsiveness, rather than on quantity of material included.
1.4.4 Questions or Requests for Additional Information
The questions and subsequent responses shall be shared with all potential Bidders at the Bidders Conference scheduled for April 6,1998 at the New York PSC. The identity of the requesting company shall be withheld.
Be prepared to present your proposal to the NECAC, LLC Members on May 1, 1998 at the New York PSC, at which time the NECAC, LLC may request additional information or clarification from each Bidder on the bids received. The NECAC, LLC will notify each Bidder of its scheduled presentation time. Bidders must submit written responses to such requests, via fax or e-mail (attachments must be readable in Word 7.0) to all of the addressees listed in Section 1.4.1., by 12 noon, Eastern Time on May 1, 1998. Subsequent questions may be posed at the Bidders Conference; therefore, written responses to these questions shall be due by close of business, May 11, 1998.
b) conduct negotiations with more than one Bidder simultaneously;
c) add, delete and/or change the terms of this RFP and issue corrections and amendments to the RFP;
d) accept or reject, in whole or in part, any response without giving any reason for the decision;
e) enter into a contractual arrangement with any Bidder;
f) have any documents submitted by a Bidder reviewed and evaluated by any individuals, including, independent consultants; and
The NECAC, LLC shall not be obligated in any way to make a contractual award as a result of this RFP. In no event shall the NECAC, LLC be responsible for the costs of preparing any Bidders response to this RFP; nor shall the NECAC LLC indemnify or incur any liability whatsoever to any Bidder or its subcontractors, if any, electing to participate in this RFP process.
The NECAC, LLC reserves the right to negotiate all terms and conditions in order to enter into a formal agreement with the successful Bidder. This document, the Bidders response, and full system documentation will form part of the agreement.
The NECAC, LLC reserves the right to cancel any agreement if the services or facilities do not pass mutually agreeable acceptance tests. This will be done at no cost or obligation to the NECAC, LLC.
No publicity or news releases pertaining to this RFP, responses to this RFP, discussions of any kind regarding the RFP, or the award of any agreement related to the bid document may be released without the prior written approval of the NECAC, LLC.
All work and materials must comply with all federal and state law, municipal ordinances, regulations, and directions of inspectors appointed by proper authorities having jurisdiction.
The Bidder shall not assign, transfer, or subcontract the agreement or any interest therein or any part thereof without prior written consent of the contracting entity or entities. All subcontractors must be identified and approved prior to disclosure of any information. If subcontracting is involved, the Bidder shall be responsible for the workmanship, costs, etc. incurred by the sub-contractor in the performance of their duties.
The Bidder, by stating compliance to a requirement in this RFP, agrees that the vendor has read and understood the requirement and that compliance is complete and deliverable at no additional cost unless otherwise noted.
This RFP may include unintended errors, omissions, and/or deficiencies. Therefore, the accuracy and completeness of this document and related documents are not guaranteed. In the event that such errors, omissions, and/or deficiencies are discovered by the Bidder, the Bidder shall notify the NECAC, LLC in writing by March 19, 1998.
The Bidder is expected to examine the specifications and instructions carefully. Calculation errors shall be the Bidders risk. In the event of a Bidders error in price, time or calculations, quoted items shall prevail.
1.5 Additional Contractual Terms and Conditions
This section identifies contractual terms and conditions with which the Bidder and sub-contractors must comply. The following list is in addition to the terms and conditions specified herein, and in no event be considered all encompassing.
Bidder shall comply with all applicable FCC rules and federal, state, and local statutes, regulations and case law.
2. Indemnification
Bidder shall provide indemnification with regard to damage, death, or personal injury due to Bidders acts or omissions.
3. Trademarks and Publicity
Bidder shall have no rights to use names or trademarks.
4. Confidentiality
Bidder shall not disclose confidential information.
5. Termination
The Contract shall establish the right of termination by the NECAC, LLC without liability if Bidder substantially defaults in performing obligations.
6. Limitation of Liability
Except specifically provided in the Contract, there shall be no liability for Bidders damages.
7. Taxes
Bidder shall file all tax returns required by law to be filed by Bidder. Bidder shall provide access to relevant documents for tax audits.
8. Insurance
Bidder shall maintain appropriate levels of workers compensation insurance, employers liability insurance, comprehensive general liability insurance, and motor vehicle insurance.
9. Authority
Bidder shall represent and warrant that Bidder has approval and authority to execute the Contract.
10. Mechanics Lien
Bidder shall perform services free of mechanics lien or other liens.
12. Transfer of Intellectual Property
In the event of default of the Interim Number Pooling Administrator, or upon selection of the Long Term Number Pooling Administrator, the Interim Number Pooling Administrator will make available to the contracting entity or entities, all data, systems, software and documents associated with the services provided under this RFP. The transfer of the data, systems, software and documents may occur in one of two ways, at the option of the contracting entity or entities: (1) Transfer all data, systems, software, and documents to the contracting entity or entities; or (2) Issue a no-cost, non-exclusive license for the data, systems, software and documents.
1.6 Preparation of Proposal Response
Tab 2 Functional and Technical Requirements
Tab 3 Cost and Price
Ø Ø NOTE: DO NOT INCLUDE COST OR PRICE FIGURES ANYWHERE EXCEPT IN YOUR TAB 3 RESPONSE, THE COST AND PRICE SECTION.
Proposals must specifically state how the Bidder intends to meet each individual requirement of the RFP, including the attached New York Interim Number Pooling Thousands Block Assignment Guidelines, as outlined in Section 4. Responses such as "in compliance," or "fully complies," etc., are not acceptable. All proposals meeting the stated requirements and specifications except for minor exceptions and deviations, shall be considered. Failure to meet requirements may disqualify a proposal from the selection process. However, proposals having minor exceptions and deviations shall be considered only if the following conditions are satisfied:
(b) all exceptions and deviations are appropriately justified on the basis of performance, schedule and/or relative price.
Proposal Summary (TAB 1)
Functional and Technical Requirements (TAB 2)
Cost and Price (TAB 3)
NY Interim Number Pooling Administrator RFP Pricing |
|||||
| 2Q98 | 3Q98 | 4Q98 | 1Q99 | 2Q99 | |
Fixed Cost |
|||||
| 1. | |||||
| 2. | |||||
| 3. | |||||
| 4. | |||||
| 5. | |||||
| Total Fixed Cost | |||||
Incremental (Variable) cost per 1000 Block Demand Quantity |
|||||
| 10/qtr. | |||||
| 50/qtr. | |||||
| 100/qtr. | |||||
| 500/qtr. | |||||
| 1,000/qtr. | |||||
| 5,000/qtr. | |||||
| 10,000/qtr. | |||||
| Total Incremental Cost | |||||
| Total Cost | |||||
The criteria to be used for the proposal evaluation include:
(b) delivery time frames/availability
(c) cost
(d) quality considerations
(e) responsiveness to contract provisions
(f) Bidders financial stability, history, including program management
All criteria will be equally weighted.
The Bidder shall furnish all information as requested per the applicable instructions providing sufficient data to enable the NECAC, LLC to evaluate the proposal. Any deviations or exceptions to the RFP should be noted. Any Bidder that does not completely reply to the proposal as requested may be eliminated at the discretion of the NECAC, LLC.
The Bidders responses shall reference the same article, section or paragraph number and title used in this RFP.
2.0 Overview of Thousands Block (NXX-X) Number Pooling
Thousands Block Number Pooling relies on long-term Local Number Portability (LNP) capabilities. This proposal conserves NXX codes by sharing them across several Local Service Providers (LSP) serving the same rate center(s). All ten thousand numbers within each NXX continue to be assigned to one rate center, but are shared among multiple LSPs at the thousands block (NXX-X) level within the same rate center. An example of this arrangement is shown below:
212-999-1XXX LSP-1
212-999-2XXX LSP-2
212-999-3XXX LSP-3
etc.
Therefore, LSP-1, LSP-2, LSP-3, etc., can each assign numbers from their designated thousands block within the 212-999 NPA-NXX, but only to customers residing within the designated rate center.
The 212-999 NXX shown in the example would still be assigned in its entirety to one switch entity/one LSP within the Local Exchange Routing Guide (LERG). The assigned LSP would be referred to as the code holder. Only the code holder, however, would be permitted to assign numbers within the particular thousands block or blocks that have been allocated to it. Other LSPs (blockholders) can assign numbers in their designated thousands blocks and must have them populated in the Number Portability Administration Center (NPAC) Service Management System (SMS).
The successful Bidder shall assume the Interim Number Pooling Administrator responsibilities as defined in the New York Interim Number Pooling Thousands Block (NXX-X) Assignment Guidelines, attached.
4.0 Miscellaneous Requirements
The Interim Number Pooling Administrator ("the Administrator") shall, at a minimum, be available Monday through Friday, 8AM to 5PM, Eastern Time, excluding agreed-upon holidays.
4.2 Communications Requirements
Each member of the Administrators team must have an individual telephone number. The phone system must provide the capability to allow the caller to leave a message easily. This can be accomplished by an electronic messaging system that allows the caller to leave a message for the person called.
Due to the proprietary/sensitive nature of the information managed by the Administrator, proper security measures must be taken. This includes the establishment of a secured work area with limited access and secured record retention practices. In addition, appropriate security will be required for any computer systems containing forecasting, number assignment, auditing or applicant information. This requirement includes any system that is interconnected to any telecommunications network.
The Administrator must provide voicemail, e-mail, and facsimile, to be accessible on a 7-day, 24-hour basis to fully meet the needs of the service providers. It is expected that the Administrator will respond within one business day to inquiries or questions submitted outside of normal business hours. Responses to requests for block allocations will be accommodated within the intervals specified in the New York Interim Number Pooling Thousands Block (NXX-X) Assignment Guidelines.
Staffing must be at an appropriate level to ensure that the Administrator can efficiently perform the functions identified in this RFP, and provide timely responses. If situations warrant, the Staff must also be available at other times deemed necessary to meet the needs of the service providers.
The physical location of the administration facility is at the discretion of the Bidder. However, the Staff must be able to travel, when necessary, to meet the needs of the service providers (e.g., seminars, regulatory hearings, NPA relief activities, etc.).
Proposed staffing profiles and levels (in terms of full-time equivalents), as well as the physical location of the Staff and estimated travel budget must be part of the Bidders response.
The following operating principles apply to the provision of enterprise services.
5.2 Required Enterprise Service
Draft-New York Interim Number Pooling
Thousands Block (NXX-X) Assignment Guidelines
TABLE OF CONTENTS
revised 2/27/98
Section |
Title |
Objective |
| Preface | ||
| 1.0 | Purpose and Scope | |
| 2.0 | Considerations, Assumptions and Constraints | |
| 3.0 | Block Assignment Principles | |
| 4.0 | Pre-conditions and Requirement of the Applicant for the Assignment & Reservation of Thousand Blocks (NXX-X) | *Criteria for 1,000 number
block assignment. Grandfathered NXX assignments Utilization and fill Access to the Industry Pool |
| 5.0 | Responsibilities of Code Holder & LERG Assignee | |
| 6.0 | Responsibilities of Block Applicants & Holders | Who updates NPAC with block
assignment, PA or SP? [if blocks are shown in LERG, maintenance of information] [If NPAC needs to know e.g. snapback to block holder , update NPAC] |
| 7.0 | Requirement & Responsibilities of Pooling Administrator | Who updates NPAC with block
assignment, PA or SP? Process of assigning block [If NPAC needs to know e.g. snapback to block holder , update NPAC] |
| 8.0 | Establishment of Industry Pool | Process to submit block to pool |
| 9.0 | Pool Level Maintenance Procedures | |
| 10.0 | Special Requests & Vanity Numbers | |
| 11.0 | Jeopardy Situations NPA Rate Center |
form in appendix |
| 12.0 | Appeals Process | Dispute resolution |
| 13.0 | Compliance (auditing) | Role of regulatory bodies Serviced Provider Certification of usage |
| 14.0 | Glossary | |
| Appendices A to F |
|
|
| Central Office Block (NXX-X) Assignment Request and Confirmation Forms | ||
| NXX-X Code Assignment | ||
| Part 2 - Routing and Rating Information (Forms 1-6) | ||
| Part 3 - Administrators Response/Confirmation | ||
| Part 4 - Confirmation of Block Activation | ||
| Forecast/TBUS Form (per section 7.3, 6.7, 9.2, 8.1.3 | ||
| Reports | Industry/Regulatory Reports on utilization of the pool & forecast on projected future usage. |
Open Items: Vacant and blank number treatment Snap back and contamination
PREFACE
New York Interim Number Pooling Guidelines Committee
Attention: Beth Gunter
Bell Atlantic
1 East Pratt Street, 3E
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
(TEL) 410-736-6811
(E-MAIL) beth.a.gunter@bellatlantic.com
OR
Rochelle Jones
Time Warner
300 First Stamford Place
Stamford, CT 06902-6732
(TEL) 203-328-4002
(E-MAIL) rochelle38@aol.com
Illinois Number Pooling Guidelines Committee:
Shawn Murphy
Pat Fleck
1.0 Purpose and Scope of This Document
This document specifies interim guidelines for the assignment processes of thousands blocks (NXX-Xs) to service providers for use at a switching entity or point of interconnection (POI) they own or control. In addition, these guidelines outline the processes between the Pooling Administrator, Code Holder, Block Holder, CO Code Administrator and NPAC.
Number pooling allows for sharing of central office codes (NXXs) to multiple service providers serving the same rate center. All ten thousand numbers within each NXX continue to be assigned to one rate center, but can be shared among multiple service providers at the thousands-block (NXX-X) level. Examples of uses for blocks for which these guidelines apply include plain old telephone service (POTS), Centrex, Direct Inward Dialing (DID), wireless service , data lines, facsimile, and coin phones.
These guidelines do not supersede appropriate NANP area governmental or regulatory principles, procedures, and requirements.
Where number pooling has not been implemented, or is not in use by the service provider applicants are considered Code Holders and shall apply directly to the CO Code Administrator for numbering resources. Guidelines addressing the assignment of central office codes (NXX) are covered under the Central Office (NXX) Assignment Guidelines (INC 95-0407-008).
2.0 Considerations, Assumptions and Constraints
The development of the assignment guidelines include the following assumptions and constraints:
2.1 NANP resources, including those covered in these guidelines, are collectively managed by the North American Telecommunications industry with oversight of the North American regulatory authorities.
The NANP resources are considered a public resource and are not owned by the assignees or the administrator. Consequently, the resources cannot be sold, brokered, bartered, or leased by the assignee for a fee or other consideration.
If a resource is sold, brokered, bartered, or leased for a fee, the resource is subject to reclamation by the Pooling Administrator.
2.2 NANP numbering resources shall be assigned to implement the most effective and efficient use of a finite numbering resource in order to prevent premature exhaust of the NANP and delay the need to develop and implement costly new numbering plans. Efficient resource management and code conservation are necessary due to the industry impacts of expanding the numbering resource (e.g., expansion from 10 to 11 digits). Impacts to the industry include:
2.3 These guidelines are interim and were developed to operate under a Port-On-Demand architecture environment in the NY NPAs affected by number pooling. These guidelines are intended to remain in place until national guidelines are developed and implemented.
2.4 These assignment guidelines apply only to the assignment of thousands blocks to block applicants serving rate centers: a) that are subject to pooling by industry agreement or regulatory directive or both, and b) where permanent service provider number portability (LNP-LRN) has been implemented by the block applicant.
2.5 These guidelines do not address the issue of who will fulfill the role of Number Pooling Administrator(s). These guidelines were developed by the industry without any assumption on who would be the Number Pooling Administrator.
2.6 Applicants, utilizing resources from the pool, shall:
3.0 Block Assignment Principles
The following assignment principles apply to all aspects of the Number Pooling Guidelines:
3.1 Where number pooling has been implemented, the Number Pooling Administrator will assign non-working numbering resources in 1,000 block increments. Resources will be available from both contaminated and non-contaminated blocks.
3.2 A requirement for an entire NXX code (i.e., 10,000 numbers) to satisfy the numbering needs for a single customer may be satisfied by the CO Code Administrator with an informal copy to the Pooling Administrator
3.3 Numbering resources in the Industry Inventory Pool shall be available and allocated to service providers in a fair and non-discriminatory manner, including special requests for specific blocks.
3.4 The information submitted by applicants for block assignments shall be kept to a minimum and shall be uniform for all applicants. All information provided on the NXX-X request form will be considered confidential, with selected information made available publicly only for those fields that must be input to the RDBS and BRIDS. The information placed in the RDBS or BRIDS becomes public upon assignment of the block in the appropriate routing data base product.
3.5 Block assignments will be made from NXX codes assigned and utilized within a single rate center.
3.6 The Number Pooling Administrator shall attempt to satisfy all requests (i.e., technical/marketing requests) for a specific NXX-X.
3.7 Any entity that is denied the assignment of one or more blocks under these guidelines has the right to appeal that decision per Section 12.0.
3.8 There must be a technical need for an initial block assignment. Utilization criteria or forecasts will not be used to justify an initial block (NXX-X) assignment. The technical need for an initial block assignment will be based upon one of the following:
3.9 Assignments of additional blocks shall be made based upon both on technical and growth needs -last sentence needs additional wordsmithing. Also, some of this section, if not all, belongs in section 4.
3.10 Requests for block reservation will be accepted. Block applicants should demonstrate good faith efforts to eliminate or to minimize the number of reserved blocks.
3.11 These guidelines are not intended to be used to satisfy carriers vanity number needs. Refer to Section 10.
3.12 Block assignment while the NPA and/or rate center is in jeopardy will require special handling as referenced in section 11.0.
3.13 A block applicant will request their own contaminated block from the pool, wherever possible.
4.0 Pre-conditions and Requirement of the applicant for the Assignment & Reservation of Thousand Blocks (NXX-X)
The assignment pre-conditions and requirements in the following sections shall be used by the Pooling Administrator(s) in reviewing a block request from a service provider for an initial or additional block.
4.1.1 The applicant must be licensed or certified to operate in the area, if required, and must certify to the Pooling Administrator that all applicable regulatory authority required to provide the service for which the block is required has been obtained.
4.1.2 The applicant must certify a need for a 1,000 block for both initial and additional blocks.
4.1.3 The applicant must submit an NXX-X request form certifying that a need exists for an NXX-X assignment to a point of interconnection or a switching entity. The NXX-X request form must provide an Operating Company Number (OCN) which uniquely identifies the applicant.
4.1.4 The applicant must have previously submitted a block forecast consistent with requirements provided in Section 8.1.3 in order to be eligible for assignment of blocks.
4.2 Blocks (NXX-Xs) are assigned to service providers for use at a Switching Entity or Point of Interconnection they own or control. Assignment of the initial block(s) will be used to the extent required to provide PSTN traffic as authorized or permitted by the appropriate regulatory or governmental authorities, and provided all the criteria in Sections 4.1.1 through 4.1.3 are met.
4.3 For additional blocks for growth, the applicant must certify that existing numbering resources do not reasonably meet the requirements for an additional block(s). Each block holder will certify that existing blocks for the switching entity/POI, per service provided by that switching entity or POI, will exhaust within 6 months. In addition, the block holder must have documented and be prepared to supply as described in this Section, Sections 2 and 3, and Section 14 (Compliance) supporting data in the form of:
4.3.1 The applicant certifies that an additional block(s) are necessary for distinct or unique service needs, separate from the growth blocks as described in Section 4.3. (See Section 1.7 of Part 1 form.)
4.4.1 If a reserved block is not activated within six months (check timeframe), the block will be released from reservation. See Section 9.1.
4.4.2 Reservations may be extended under the following circumstances:
The following section describes the responsibilities of the Code Holder/LERG Assignee. This section also defines the relationship between the Code Holder/LERG Assignee and the Block Holder as well as the relationship between the Code Holder/LERG Assignee and the Pooling Administrator.
5.1 Code Holders shall:
6.0 Responsibilities of Block Applicants and Holders
Applicants, utilizing resources from the pool, shall:
6.1 Additional information and or dialog may be required by the Number Pooling Administrator to facilitate block application processing. The Number Pooling Administrator is still required to respond within 10 business days.
6.2 If a service provider is deploying a new switching entity that requires the assignment of an LRN, the block applicant will indicate on the request form the need for assignment of a new NXX to become the LERG assignee for the purposes of being assigned an LRN.
6.3 The Application Process
6.3.1 Block applicants for initial and/or additional NXX-X block assignments shall submit their requests to the Pooling Administrator using the Number Pooling (NXX-X) Assignment Request and Confirmation Form (Block Request Form).
6.3.2 There is no upper limit on the number of blocks that can be requested on one application form. The application form is structured per rate center, per switch. However, a request for an entire NXX code to satisfy the numbering needs for a single customer may be submitted to the CO Code Administrator with an informal copy to the Pooling Administrator.
6.3.3 The block applicant must accurately complete all required entries with current information on the Block Request Form. Additionally, block applicant must certify that necessary governmental/regulatory authorization has been obtained to provide the service(s) for which the block is being requested. Electronic transfer will be considered as signature.
An Operating Company Number (OCN), which uniquely identifies the applicant, must be provided. The applicant can get OCN information by calling TRA. (See the Forms Part 1, Section 2???check sections)*** Is the information regarding OCN needed? Yes if LERG changes are made. If so, should it be the OCN or the Company Code? OCN, not company code. What does the NPAC need? N/A for the application process. NPAC is not involved.
6.3.4 The Block applicant should indicate on the request if any thousands block (i.e., 0-9) can be assigned or whether, for technical/marketing reasons, only certain thousands blocks may be assigned. The block applicant can request specific blocks on their application. ACTION: Check to make sure this is shown on the form itself.
A block applicant will request their own contaminated block from the pool, wherever possible.
6.3.5 The Service Provider can refuse the assignment of a block when the block does not meet their technical/marketing constraints.
6.3.6 Requests for block assignments should not be made more than 6 months (Bell Atl. Suggests 3 months) prior to the requested effective date.
6.3.7 When requesting additional and/or initial block assignments, applicants shall meet the requirements as described in Section 2, 3 and 4 . and conform to the conditions contained therein.
6.4 Information Required For Block Allocation
6.4.1 Block Applicants should request effective dates at least 21 (Bell Atl. Suggests 42 calendar days) calendar days , after the date of receipt of the block request by the Pooling Administrator. This 21 (42) calendar day interval is necessary because internal company notification, etc. It should be noted that interconnection arrangements and facilities need to be in place prior to activation of a block. Such arrangements are outside the scope of these guidelines.
6.4.2 A block applicant or holder will be responsible for entering NXX-X block information (LRN) into the appropriate databases for calling card validation, etc., as they currently do today.
6.5 Ongoing Administration
6.5.1 Notification of LERG changes
The information associated with a block assignment may change over time. Such changes may occur, for example, because of the transfer of a block to a different switching entity within the same rate center. The Pool Administrator must be notified of any changes to the information in Part 1 of the NXX-X Block Assignment Request Form. This includes changes such as, but not limited to, OCN, switching entity/POI. For data integrity reasons, the Pooling Administrator must be informed of these types of changes to ensure that an accurate record of the entity responsible for the block and the data associated with the block is accurate.
It is the responsibility of the block holder to arrange for the entry of any changes to RDBS and BRIDS data associated with a switching entity/POI including, but not limited to, Office Functionality and Switching Entity-Network Services through the Administrator, or the company with (AOCN) authorization.
6.5.2 The holder of a NXX-X block assigned by the Administrator(s) or acquired by other means such as transfer (i.e., by merger or acquisition) must use the block consistent with these guidelines. Additionally, the new block holder must participate in the audit process.
6.5.3 Any revisions to the data already submitted on an NXX-X Block Assignment Request Form, Part 1, must be submitted to the Administrator as soon as the block holder is aware of these changes. This information is necessary regardless of who has RDBS and BRIDS database input responsibilities.
6.6 Block Use
Block assignments are made subject to the conditions listed in Section 2, 3 and 4. A block assigned to an entity, either directly by the Pooling Administrator or through transfer from another entity, should be placed in service within 6 months) (review this date since this will give you 12 months overall - suggest 3 months from the initially published effective date) after the initially published effective date. Certification of in service will be required (see Number Pooling (NXX-X) Assignment Request and Confirmation Form - Part 4). If the assignee no longer has need for the block or the contamination level of the block qualifies the block for return to the pool, the block should be returned to the Pooling Administrator for reassignment. If it is determined through the audit process or other means that a block is not in use after 6 months, as noted above, the Pooling Administrator will request the return of the block.
6.6.1 All block holders agree to abide by the block reclamation procedures outlined in Section 9.1.
6.7 Industry Pool/NPA Planning Information
6.7.1 All block holders shall provide forecasted block requirements to the Pooling Administrator for projecting rate center exhaust and for input to the NPA code relief planning process. All such forecasts shall be treated on a proprietary basis.
6.7.2 Block Holders will provide to CO Code Administrator demand for rate centers that are not pooled using existing COCUS procedures. Block Holder will provide to Pooling Administrator forecast data for rate centers included in number pooling. Forecasted block information furnished by block holders shall be submitted on the form provided in Appendix ??to the Pooling Administrator. This forecast data will then become input to the annual COCUS study conducted by the CO Code Administrator.
6.7.3 The service provider shall perform all functions necessary to remove the block(s) from their internal systems and perform any porting to the NPAC that is necessary within ??? calendar days (Bell Atl. Suggests 66 calendar days for return of initial vacant and contaminated blocks).
6.7.4 Block Holders will provide telephone number utilization reports in accordance with Section 9.1
7.0 Requirements of Pooling Administrator
The following describes the responsibilities of the pooling administrator in: 1) assigning blocks of numbering resources to eligible service providers, 2) reporting status regarding pooling resources to Industry and Regulatory Authorities, 3) Forecasting & Planning, 4) General Administration processes.
7.1 Assignment Process
7.1.1 The administrator shall accept and process applications for block requests in an efficient and timely manner. Requests for block assignments shall be responded to within ten (10) business days.
7.1.2 The administrator shall confirm that the applicant is eligible to make the request, and that the service provider has certified a need for the block assignment.
7.1.3 The administrator should attempt to satisfy industry demands based on the technical and usage requirement of each service provider with blocks associated with the lowest level of contamination; first considering the use of uncontaminated blocks (i.e., 0%), and only then considering employing blocks with increasing levels of contamination (up to 10%).
7.1.4 The Pooling Administrator will work with Service Providers and will first attempt to fill requests with no specific block requirements first with the 0, 1, 8 and 9 thousand blocks and a contaminated block, where applicable.
7.1.5 The Pooling Administrator reserves the right to negotiate specific assignment of thousands blocks (e.g., which thousands block to assign, assign partial request or hold entire request) with the service provider when only a portion of the application can be satisfied immediately with blocks from the pool.
7.1.6 If a specific block request (s) is made on an application, the Pooling Administrator will attempt to satisfy the request with available blocks in the pool. If the block applicant requests a specific block for technical reasons and the Pooling Administrator cannot satisfy the request with available blocks in the pool, the Pooling Administrator may request a new NXX code from the Code Administrator.
7.1.7 The PA is responsible to apply for new NXX codes in three specific instances: 1) a Service Providers request can only partially be filled, and 2) periodic replenishment of the pool is required and 3) need new NXX code assignment for LRN purposes. The PA shall request NXX codes to the CO Code Administrator acting as the authorized agent for the LERG assignee/service provider ACTION: Need legal review by carriers. (see section 2.??)
The PA is responsible for obtaining additional information to complete part 2 (if required) (i.e., switching info., routing and rating data, etc.) from the designated service provider (i.e., LERG assignee) in order to complete CO Code Application form and forward it to the CO Code Administrator for normal processing in accordance with CO Code guidelines. Upon request of a Service Provider and for a fee, the Pooling Administrator may perform input of Part 2 data acting on behalf of the service provider. Service Providers may also elect to perform Part 2 inputs themselves or request a third party to input this data.
7.1.8 When the Pooling Administrator identifies the need for additional NXX(s) codes to replenish the pool (it is expected that the administrator would identify the need for replenishment 9 months prior to exhaust within the rate center), the Pooling Administrator will determine a service provider (i.e., LERG assignee) to provide vacant code treatment based on service provider forecasts for future demand, and contact that service provider to request that that service provider become the NXX assignee for the new code. The Pooling Administrator will submit the appropriate application to the code administrator and shall assign, at minimum, one block within the NXX code when assigned
In instances where the Service Provider does not designate a particular rate center for LRN assignment purposes, the administrator should recommend which rate center should be assigned an NXX in order to ensure efficient utilization of numbering resources. (needs wordsmithing here)
7.1.9 The Pooling Administrator will ensure that the block applicant places the code in service within the time frame specified in Section 6.6 of these guidelines. If the assigned block is not used within this time frame, the Pooling Administrator(s) shall request the return of the block for reassignment.
7.2 Reporting Issues
7.2.1 The pooling administrator shall prepare and publish reports quarterly or as required to industry, NANPA, and regulatory authorities on utilization of the industry pool and provide forecasts on projected future usage.
7.2.2 The pooling administrator will provide jeopardy notification status (see section 11).
7.3 Forecasting & Planning
7.3.1 The administrator shall monitor the supply of available blocks for each of the rate centers being administered. This includes, but is not limited to anticipating the demand upon the pool and replenishing the supply as needed.
7.3.2 The Pooling Administrator shall:
a) receive and compile forecasts of demand from service providers for numbering resources within given rate centers,
b) analyze service provider forecasts to determine the numbering resources required to maintain the industry inventory pool at 9 months supply,
c) assure the availability, based upon industry established criteria, of numbering resources within the industry inventory for a given rate center,
d) add to the resources in the industry inventory pool when necessary, by requesting additional CO codes from the CO code administrator, consistent with yet to be established process.
7.3.3 The Pooling Administrator will also aggregate Block Holder forecast data and submit data to the Code Administrator(s) and to the NANPA for use in the annual COCUS studies.
7.4 General Administrative
7.4.1 The Pooling Administrator shall maintain an industry database accessible to all service providers through some mechanism yet to be defined to include all pooled thousand blocks and the status of the blocks, i.e., assigned, non-assigned and identified contamination (i.e., specific TNs not available) with the initial establishment of the pool. The Pooling Administrator shall maintain a secure database that will include all pooled 1000 blocks, the status of the block, (i.e., assigned, non-assigned Wordsmith this to include that PA will keep confidential certain sections of data and let PA figure out how to set up db.
7.4.2 The Pooling Administrator may arrange for and/or perform audits of service provider utilization of assigned resources, as required.
7.4.3 The Pooling Administrator will participate in and or facilitate audits, as required.
7.4.4 The Pooling Administrator shall:
b) Assist CO Code Administrator in analyzing and helping to resolve problems related to misrouted calls and calls that cannot be completed.
c) Track switch cutovers and block reassignments, and perform other operational functions; e.g., block reclamation.
8.0 Initial Establishment of Industry Pool
The pool shall initially be established from donations of service provider embedded resources that meet the criteria outlined in section 8.2.1 and 8.2.4 including, if necessary, new NXX code blocks which are obtained from the CO Code Administrator.
8.1 Pool Sizing
8.1.1 The pooling administrator will determine what level of resources is needed to meet the demand and will advise the Service Providers of blocks that are required for return. The pooling administrator will also determine what contamination level (e.g.,7%) is required to meet demand. In cases where the NPA or rate center is in jeopardy, the pooling administrator will need to re-evaluate the pool size.
8.1.2 The size of the number pool will be a 9 months supply for each rate center will be determined from pooling analysis of service providers forecast.
8.1.3 All existing service providers will submit a forecast, on a semi-annual basis , by rate area to the Pooling Administrator. The Pooling Administrator may also request a forecast on a per rate center basis if needed. The forecast will be for a rolling 18 month period submitted using a quarterly view format determined by the Pooling Administrator. The Pooling Administrator will establish and publish a schedule for the semi-annual forecast. If the Pooling Administrator makes a forecast request on a per rate center basis, service providers shall typically reply within a reasonable period of time (e.g., 14 calendar days). If circumstances warrant, the Pooling Administrator may specify a particular time period based on the size and urgency of the request. An initial service provider is expected to provide a forecast at the time they make application for their first block.
8.1.4 The Pooling Administrator will aggregate rate center forecasts and develop a new forecast using aggregated and other analysis factors (e.g., considering historical growth). If block demand will exceed availability of returned blocks, the Pooling Administrator will request additional NXX codes, as required, from the Code Administrator.
8.2 Process for Identifying and Donating Embedded Resources
8.2.1 Participants shall identify, and submit to the Pooling Administrator, all blocks which have contamination of no more than 10% (including zero). Of those blocks, participants may retain identified blocks if the provider can certify that:
a) a block will exceed 10% contamination within 6 months,
b) if only one block exists, or
c) can otherwise justify and explain maintaining block for other technical reasons. Retention of blocks is subject to audit and appeal procedures.
Pooling Administrator will assess all technical reasons (as certified in section c above) for validity and will refer disputed reasons to the appropriate regulating authorities or their designate.
8.2.2 Service Providers will identify (to whom - NPAC?) the actual working telephone numbers of any contaminated blocks that are being returned.
8.2.3 The pooling administrator will build the pool by taking first all clean/vacant blocks, then contaminated blocks, where needed. For contaminated blocks, the Pooling Administrator will take back blocks with the least amount of contamination first (taking blocks from all service providers equally) until pool supply is satisfied. Lastly, the PA will apply a new NXX codes if both vacant and contaminated blocks do not adequately satisfy pool level.
8.2.4 All vacant blocks that a service provider cannot justify retaining initially will be returned to the Pooling Administrator. Porting of numbers from contaminated blocks (i.e., intra service provider port) will occur when the block is donated to the industry pool. When a contaminated block is assigned, the Pooling Administrator will notify the block applicant that the assigned block(s) is contaminated and will provide a list of working Telephone Numbers within the contaminated block that are not available for the block applicants use. (Bell Atl. Suggests that the NPAC provide the list of working telephone numbers within the contaminated block).
8.2.5 The service provider shall perform all functions necessary to remove the block(s) from their internal systems and perform any porting to the NPAC that is necessary within ??? calendar days. (Bell Atl. Suggests 66 calendar days).
8.3 New CO Code Requests Procedures
8.3.1 The following provides the process flow and activation procedures for CO Codes in order to provide additional blocks to the Industry Inventory Pool:
or
8.3.2 The Pooling Administrator will utilize the following process for selecting a LERG Assignee for a growth NXX that is to be added to the Industry Inventory Pool:
The replenishment of the resource via the assignment of a new NXX code, for a particular rate center, shall be subject to the same criteria as that used for thousands blocks made available at the initial establishment of the pool at the outset of block assignments. It is expected that administration of the resource will require periodic replenishment by the assignment of new NXX code(s) assignments such that the numbering resources for rate centers meets demand and prevents exhaustion.
The pooling administrator will maintain the required pool level by first replenishing the industry pool by obtaining:
a) any eligible contaminated blocks as defined in section 8.2.3, and
b) new blocks via the assignment of a CO Code.
9.1 Block Recovery Procedures
Utilization reports from service providers can be requested on a specific rate center basis, as needed. Service providers are expected to provide utilization reports on an annual basis, at minimum. It is expected that return of contaminated blocks within this process will occur within 21 calendar days.
Service Providers are expected to return a Code and/or Block if the default LERG assignee, assigned to the CO Code, no longer provides service in the rate area associated with the NXX. This is subject to auditing procedures as defined in section 13.0.
9.1.2 The entity to which a block(s) has been assigned from the pool (as opposed to embedded base) shall return the block(s) to the Pooling Administrator if:
9.1.3 If the block(s) was not activated within the timeframe specified in these guidelines, the assignee may apply to the Pooling Administrator for an extension date. Such an extension request must include the reason for the delay and a new activation time commitment, not to exceed 6 months???.
9.1.4 Pooling Administrator Responsibility
The Pooling Administrator will contact any block assignee(s) identified as not having returned to the administrator for reassignment any block(s):
The administrator will seek clarification from the assignee(s) regarding the alleged non-use or misuse. If the assignee(s) provides an explanation satisfactory to the administrator, and in conformance with these assignment guidelines the block(s) will remain assigned. If no satisfactory explanation is provided, the administrator will issue a letter to the assignee(s) returning the assigned block(s). If a direct contact can not be made with the assignee(s) to effect the above process a registered letter will be sent to the assignee(s) address of record. The letter will request that they contact the administrator within 30 days regarding the alleged resource non-use or misuse. The block will be made available after 30 days for assignment.
9.1.5 If a block is not activated within the timeframe specified in these guidelines and the administrator determines, by discussion with the block(s) assignee, that the reason for the non-activation is not within the control of the assignee(s), the administrator may extend the activation date by up to 90 days (check date - action and synch with 9.1.3). Also include comment about SP keeping block until technical requirement is resolved.
9.1.6 The Pooling Administrator will receive, process, and refer to the appropriate regulating authorities any application from block assignees when extensions on block activation dates meets one or more of the following criteria:
Referral to the appropriate regulating authorities or their designate will include the offered reason why the extension was requested, a new proposed activation date, and the administrators recommended action.
The Pooling Administrator will make all returned resources available for assignment after 21 calendar days.
A default LERG Assignee who is returning block(s) in conjunction with the return of an NXX code and Section 9.1.1 shall perform all functions necessary to remove the blocks(s) from their internal systems and perform any porting to the NPAC that is necessary in accordance with the existing process and timeframes (total 66 calendar days) used for the establishment of a new CO Code.
9.1.7 The Pooling Administrator will advise the regulating authority of any disputed reclamation actions.
9.1.8 Regulating Authorities or their Designate Responsibilities
The regulating authorities or their designate will:
9.2 Ongoing Block Holder Forecasting Process -
9.2.1 All service providers will submit a forecast as described in Section 8.1 (Pool Sizing and in Section 6.7 (Industry Pool/NPA Planning Information).
9.2.2 Information furnished by block holders shall be submitted on the form provided in Appendix ???. This data will be aggregated and submitted by the Pooling Administrator to the CO Code Administrator for use in annual COCUS studies for projecting NPA exhaust. The Pooling Administrator will internally aggregate, analyze & synthesize forecast data for use in determining rate center exhaust.
9.2.3 All block holders agree to abide by the block reclamation procedures outlined in Section 9.1. - maybe move to block assignment principles if not already there.
9.2.4 The Pooling Administrator will aggregate service provider data as described in Section 8.1 (Pool Sizing).
9.2.5 Semi-annual TBUS studies (5 year view at rate center level) will be conducted utilizing projected demand forecasts, provided by block holders (see Section ???), to identify rate centers nearing exhaust. The schedule for projected exhaust will be forwarded by NANPA to the appropriate Pooling Administrator(s) and published in summary format for industry use.
10.0 Special Requests & Vanity Numbers
Request for a block to satisfy a single vanity number is not allowed.
11.0 NPA and NXX Jeopardy Situations
When it is determined by the Code Administrator(s) based on the NPA Code Relief Planning Guidelines (INC 94-1216-004check this number) that an NPA is in jeopardy, the following actions will be taken to provide relief in the jeopardy NPA.
D. Prior to any Industry meeting called by the CO Code Administrator, the Pooling Administrator shall call a meeting of all participating pooling members for the purpose of determining a consensus position.
E. The Pooling Administrator shall, unless otherwise explicitly requested not to by an individual member, represent all members of the pool at any Industry Jeopardy Planning Meetings. The Pooling Administrator shall ensure that the conservation measures adopted by the industry reflect the needs of the pooling membership as compared to any single entity not participating in pooling.
F. For blocks reserved per Section 4.4:
11.1.2 Unique circumstances within a given jeopardy NPA may require extraordinary NPA-specific pooling conservation procedures. In this event, the following activities shall apply.
11.2 Rate Center Jeopardy Situations
A rate center jeopardy situation exists when the available resources and the actual and forecasted demand falls below 66 calendar days. This situation is not expected to occur, based on the pooling administrators administration responsibilities, but can occur, if demand outpaces the rate center block forecast.
When it is determined by the Pooling Administrator based on the criteria outlined in section ??? of these guidelines that a rate center is in jeopardy (i.e., that thousands blocks are expected to exhaust prior to their replenishment), the following actions will be taken to provide relief in the jeopardy rate center.
4) For additional blocks for growth, the applicant must certify that existing numbering resources do not reasonably meet the requirements for an additional block(s). Each block holder whether new entrant or existing SP will certify that existing blocks (if any) for the switching entity/POI, per service provided by that switching entity or POI, will exhaust within the jeopardy period (i.e., if you are 30 days into the jeopardy period, that your need is within 36 days). In addition, the block holder must have documented and be prepared to supply as described in Section ???, , and Appendix ???(Audits) supporting data in the form of:
6) During the jeopardy period, extraordinary Rate Center-specific conservation procedures shall commence. In this event the following activities shall apply.
12.0 Appeals Process
Disagreements will arise between the Pooling Administrator and block holders/applicants in the context of the administration of these guidelines. In all cases, the Pooling Administrator and block holders/applicants will make reasonable, good faith efforts to resolve such disagreements amongst themselves consistent with the guidelines prior to pursuing any appeal. Appeals may include but are not limited to one or more of the
following options:
Requests for modification of these interim guidelines can be pursued as descried in Section ??? of the guidelines.
The following section addresses compliance monitoring with respect to Interim Number Pooling Thousands Block Assignment Guidelines.
The purposes of any audit are two-fold: (1) to provide an educational opportunity to those undergoing the audit, (2) to ensure that the processes and procedures of those being audited are in agreement with established guidelines.
(1) Ensure uniformity in application of guidelines
(2) Ensure consistent application of guidelines by the Pooling Administrator
(3) Ensure compliance with guidelines by block applicants and Pooling Administrator. .
13.2 Who Should Be Audited
It is expected that the Pooling Administrator, block holders(s), code holder(s) participating in pooling, using or managing the use of NANP resources will be subject to audits.
13.3 Types of Audits
Regularly Scheduled Audits - Audits which are planned in advance by the auditor where the entity being audited is notified in advance.
Audits for Cause - Audits which are not planned in advance by the auditor, but are at the specific request of the pooling administrator or a regulatory authority with appropriate jurisdiction.
13.4 Who Should Conduct the Audit
The audit should be conducted by a neutral third party, which does not exclude the pooling administrator.
While this section does not specifically address what entity(ies) will perform the audit, it is imperative that any auditor possess certain characteristics. First, the independence of the auditor must be maintained. Second, the auditor should be an independent third party. Third, the auditor must be competent in the use of and application of standard audit procedures. Finally, any auditor must have knowledge of the block assignment process which is to be audited. These qualifications should ensure that the benefits to be obtained from the audit process are indeed realized.
13.5 Who Should Receive the Results
Audit results should be available to the party being audited and upon request the regulatory authority with appropriate jurisdiction. Consideration of proprietary or confidential information will be given to the distribution of the audit results.
Audit results should be used to identify and recommend to the appropriate organization(s) specific corrective actions that may be necessary.
Modifications to the guidelines
Additional training for Pooling Administrator and/or block applicants/holders
Assignment or return of blocks
Requiring supporting documentation of future block requests in non-compliant situations
Process modifications to Pooling Administrator and/or block applicants/holder maintenance of records for block and/or number assignments
Each entity which undergoes an audit where discrepancies are identified should be required to submit a written report within ten working days to the auditor and upon request to the regulatory authority with appropriate jurisdiction . This report should provide in detail the corrective action which will be taken to resolve discrepancies found in the audit. Within one month, the entity will submit a written report to the Auditor and upon request to the regulatory authority with appropriate jurisdiction certifying that the corrective steps have been taken or are underway.
13.6 How the Audit Would Be Funded
Audits which occur will be funded as specified in the existing Pooling Administrator contract OR It is anticipated that the costs of the audits would be borne by the industry. Audits which occur in the "normal course of business" should be paid for by the industry as a whole through the NANPA Cost Recovery mechanism. Audits for cause requested by industry will be paid for by the party at fault. NEED TO REEVALUATE.
13.7 What Should Be Audited
The audit should examine:
2. Files and records relating to NANP resources. . This includes examining a random sample for completeness and accuracy as well as compliance with time intervals specified in these guidelines.
To achieve the benefits of an audit process, various principles and benchmarks contained within these guidelines should be considered during an audit. These principles are reflective of the anticipated benefits of an audit while the benchmarks provide an objective measurement of the degree to which the principles are being met. Examples of these principles and the associated benchmarks are as follows:
Pooling Administrator(s):
Benchmarks:
(a) Responding to requests within 10 business days.
(b) ensure neutrality pursuant to administration of these guidelines
(c) Comparable response to like requests.
(d) Maintenance of records and block requests
2. Principle: Uniformity in block management practices
Benchmarks:
(a) Provides current block utilization study data to CO Code Administrator.
(b) Monitors the number of blocks assigned in an NPA for which they are responsible, and notifies CO Code Administrator/NANPA of a significant changes in jeopardy situations.
(c) Implement jeopardy NPA and Rate Center procedures.
3. Principle: Consistent treatment and safeguarding of confidential information
Benchmarks:
(a) Maintain active/archive records in a secure environment.
(b) Uses documented specific processes to ensure confidentiality.
4. Principle: Consistent approach/response to block reservations
Benchmark:
(a)Retains records of reservations.
(b)Monitors and conforms to reclamation procedures
Block Applicants:
1. Principle: Substantiation of certification
Benchmarks:
(a) Verification of service provided relative to block requests.
(b) Verification of regulatory certification.
2. Principle: Uniformity in block management practices
Benchmarks:
(a) Substantiates months to exhaust determination.
(b) Forecast block requirements.
(c) Implement rate center jeopardy procedures.
It should be noted that various forms/reports identified in these Guidelines should facilitate the review of the benchmarks identified above.
13.8 Location of Audit
The actual audit may take place on the service provider's or Pooling Administrators premises or, where more practical, the service provider and/or Pooling Administrator may be asked to forward the appropriate documentation to the auditor.
13.9 Auditors Responsibilities
The auditor should perform audits in a fair and non-discriminatory manner to encourage efficient utilization of the NANP resources. The auditor should follow generally accepted auditing practices.
13.10 Audits of Code Holders/ Block Holders
13.10.1 Pooling Administrator's Responsibilities in an Audit
The Pooling Administrator(s) will provide the designated auditing agency with current guidelines. The Pooling Administrator(s) may assist the auditor in identifying potential block holders code holders that are utilizing the NANP resource, the relevant criteria to be utilized in the audit, and relevant administrative records related to that criteria.
13.10.2 Block Applicant/Code Holder Responsibilities in an Audit
Each entity being audited is required to provide information requested by the auditor within an agreed upon timeframe. The entity shall be responsible to be available to provide clarification necessary for auditor to complete the audit. The entity is required to take corrective action on any discrepancies identified by the auditor.
13.11 Audits of the Pooling Administrator
Pooling Administrator is required to provide information requested by the auditor within the agreed upon timeframe. The Pooling Administrator shall be responsible to be available to provide clarification necessary for auditor to complete the audit. The Pooling Administrator is required to take corrective action on any discrepancies identified by the auditor.
13.12 Recommended Audit Timeframes
a) of block holder - 1 time per year
b) of Pooling Administrator - 1 time per year
Random Audits:
of block holder - spot check ___% of service providers on specific items most likely subject to non-conformance (to be determined by auditor) at least once on an annual basis.
Audits for Cause:
as needed basis.
14.0 Glossary
| Active Block | A block formally assigned by the Pooling Administrator and implemented by the block holder in the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) for specific routing or rating requirements. | |
| Assigned Block | ||
| Allocated Block | ||
| Additional NXX-X Block Assignment for Growth | A block assigned to a switching entity or point of interconnection subsequent to the assignment of the first code (See: Initial Block), for the same purpose as a block that was previously assigned to the same switching entity or point of interconnection. A "Growth Block" is requested when the line numbers available for assignment in a previously assigned block code will not meet expected demand. | |
| Affected Parties | Affected parties are a) those entities that have applied for and/or received central office block (NXX-X) assignments or reservations within the NXX b) administrative entities involved in number administration, number portability or number pooling. | |
| Authorized Representative of Block Applicant | The person from the applicants organization or its agent that has the legal authority to take action on behalf of the applicant. | |
| Block | 1,000 telephone numbers with all numbers being from within the same 1,000 block range within the NXX | |
| Block Applicant | The entity for whom a 1,000 block (NXX-X) is being requested. | |
| Block (NXX-X) Exhaust | A point in time at which the quantity of TNs within existing block (NXX-X) which are "Available for Assignment" equals zero within a switching entity/POI or, conversely, when the quantities of "Working Telephone Numbers" plus "TNs Unavailable for Assignment" equal 1,000 times the quantity of existing blocks (NXX-X) assigned to a switching entity/POI. | |
| Block Holder | The entity to whom a 1,000 block (NXX-X) has been assigned for use. | |
| BRIDS | The Bellcore Rating Input Data Base System (BRIDS) contains data in the rating of calls. Data supports all CO Codes assigned through these Guidelines, as well as all CO Codes in place prior to the existence of these Guidelines, and covers all Numbering Plan Areas (NPAs) administered under the North American Numbering Plan (NANP). BRIDS is a replacement database for BRADS. | |
| Central Office Code | The sub-NPA code in a telephone number, i.e., digits D-E-F of a 10-digit NANP Area address. Central office codes are in the form "NXX", where N is a number from 2 to 9 and X is a number from 0 to 9. Central office codes may also be referred to as "NXX codes". | |
| CLLIâ | Common Language Location Identifierâ is an eleven-character descriptor of a switch and is used for routing calls. | |
| CO Code (NXX) Exhaust | A point in time at which the quantity of TNs within existing CO codes (NXX) which are "Available for Assignment" equals zero within a switching entity/POI or, conversely, when the quantities of "Working Telephone Numbers" plus "TNs Unavailable for Assignment" equal 10,000 times the quantity of existing CO codes (NXX) assigned to a switching entity/POI. Where CO code sharing occurs or partial CO codes are assigned to a switching entity/POI, the latter number should be adjusted accordingly. | |
| Certify | (When used by the applicant): As part
of the Central Office Block (NXX-X) Assignment request,
to attest, through a formal statement information
contained within the assignment request is true,
accurate, and complete to the best of his/her knowledge. (When used by regulator): Where applicable, to authorize, in writing, an entity to provide a telecommunications service in the relevant geographic area. Such authorization is the responsibility of the appropriate regulatory agency. |
|
| COCUS | Central Office code Utilization Survey (COCUS) is conducted annually by NANPA from direct input received from Central Office Code Administrator(s) in order to monitor central office code utilization, projected exhaust of NPAs and demand for new NPAs to provide code relief. The purpose of COCUS is to provide an annual overall view of both present and projected CO code (NXX) utilization for each NPA in the NANP. | |
| Code Administrator | Entity(ies) responsible for the administration of the NXXs within an NPA. | |
| Code Holder | The entity to whom a CO code (NXX) has been assigned for use at a Switching Entity or Point of Interconnection it owns or controls. | |
| Code Protection - TAKE OUT??? | Code protection is an arrangement where a central office code assigned in one NPA is not assigned in an adjacent NPA, thereby becoming projected to allow 7-digit dialing across the common boundary. | |
| Conservation | Consideration given to the efficient and effective use of a finite numbering resource in order to minimize the cost and need to expand its availability in the introduction of new services, capabilities and features. | |
| Contaminated Block | ||
| Effective Date | The date by which routing and rating changes within the PSTN must be complete for the assigned block. Also, the date by which the block becomes an active block. | |
| INC - TAKE OUT???? | Industry Numbering Committee, a standing committee of the Industry Carriers Compatibility Forum (ICCF) that provides an open forum to address and resolve industry-wide issues associated with the planning, administration, allocation, assignment and use of numbering resources and related dialing considerations for public telecommunications within the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) area. | |
| Initial Block | The first geographic NXX-X block assigned at a unique switching entity or point of interconnection. | |
| In Service | An active block in which specific subscribers or services are utilizing assigned telephone numbers. | |
| Interchangeable NPAs - TAKE OUT???? | Refers to an industry plan to expand substantially the supply of Numbering Plan Area codes (NPAs) in January 1995, by removing the restriction that the second digit of the NPA must be a 0 or 1. | |
| Interested Parties | Interested parties are service providers providing service within an area in which number pooling has been implemented. | |
| Jeopardy NPA | A jeopardy condition exists when the forecasted and/or actual demand for NXX resources will exceed the known supply during the planning/implementation interval for relief. Accordingly, pending exhaust of NXX resources within an NPA does not represent a jeopardy condition if NPA relief has been or can be planned and the additional NXXs associated with the NPA will satisfy the need for new NXX codes. | |
| Jeopardy Rate Center | A jeopardy condition exists when the forecasted and/or actual demand for NXX-X resources will exceed the known supply during the planning/implementation interval for relief. Accordingly, pending exhaust of NXX-X resources within rate center does not represent a jeopardy condition if NXX relief has been or can be planned and the additional NXX (s) associated with the Rate Center will satisfy the need for new NXX-X blocks. | |
| LATA - TAKE OUT??? | Local Access and Transport Area, also referred to as service areas by some BOCs, and serve two basic purposes: to provide a method for delineating the area within which the BOCs may offer services and, to provide a basis for determining how the assets of the former Bell System were to be divided between the BOCs and AT&T at divestiture. | |
| LERG | Local Exchange Routing Guide: contains information about the local routing data obtained from the Routing Data Base System (RDBS). This information reflects the current network configuration and scheduled network changes for all entities originating or terminating PSTN calls within the NANP excluding Canada. | |
| LERG Assignee | The entity to whom a CO code (NXX) has been assigned and/or for performing LERG assignee functions at a Switching Entity or Point of Interconnection it owns or controls. Code Holder does not necessarily imply use of all blocks within the NXX. Same as LERG Assignee. | |
| LRN | Local Routing Number - | |
| Major Vertical Coordinate | A five-digit number used with the Vertical Coordinates and Horizontal Coordinates to pinpoint the location of a rate center. The Vertical and Horizontal Coordinates can be used to calculate mileage measurements between two rate centers that is used to determine the appropriate mileage rates in determining the charge for message telephone service calls. | |
| Minor Vertical Coordinate | A five-digit number used with the Vertical Coordinates and Horizontal Coordinates to pinpoint a more specific location. The Minor Vertical and Horizontal Coordinates can be used to divide rate centers into zones for more specific distance calculations. Most often used to rate interstate messages when straight distance between the calling and called point if less than forty miles. | |
| Months to Exhaust | = TNs Available for
Assignment______ Growth (Quantity of Lines added per Month) |
|
| NANP | The North American Numbering Plan is a numbering architecture in which every station in the NANP Area is identified by a unique ten-digit address consisting of a three-digit NPA code, a three digit central office code of the form NXX, and a four-digit line number of the form XXXX. | |
| NANPA | North American Numbering Plan Administration. With divestiture, key responsibilities for coordination and administration of the North American Numbering/Dialing Plans were assigned to NANPA. These central administration functions are exercised in an impartial manner toward all industry segments while balancing the utilization of a limited resource. | |
| NANP Area | Consists of the United States, Canada and the Caribbean countries currently in NPA code 809. | |
| NPA | Numbering Plan Area, also called area
code. An NPA is the 3-digit code that occupies the A, B,
and C positions in the 10-digit NANP format that applies
throughout the NANP Area. NPAs are of the form N0/1X,
where N represents the digits 2-9 and X represents any
digit 0-9. After 1/1/95, NPAs will be of the form NXX. In
the NANP, NPAs are classified as either geographic or
non-geographic.
|
|
| NPAC | ||
| NPA Code Relief | NPA code relief refers to an activity that must be performed when and NPA nears exhaust of its 640 NNX or the 792 NXX capacity. Relief is typically provided to an NPA about a year before its capacity is reached. NPA Code Relief for an NPA that is nearing the 640 NNX limit is usually provided in the form of implementing interchangeable central office code (ICOC) which provides an additional 152 assignable central office codes. An NPA that has been implemented as ICOC has a capacity of 792 assignable NXX central office codes. Providing code relief to such an NPA normally takes the form of assigning a new NPA for an NPA split or overlay. Another option is changing the boundary of the existing NPA. | |
| NPA Relief Date | The date by which the NPA is introduced and routing of normal commercial traffic begins. | |
| OCN | Operating Company Number (OCN) assignments which must uniquely identify the applicant. Relative to CO Code assignments, NECA assigned Company Codes may be used may be used as OCNs. Companies with no prior CO Code or Company Code assignments may contact NECA (201 884-8355) to be assigned a Company Code(s). Since multiple OCNs and/or Company Codes may be associated with a given company, companies with prior assignments should direct questions regarding appropriate OCN usage to Bellcores Traffic Routing Administration (TRA) (908 699-6700). (See Part 1, Footnote 4) | |
| Point of Interconnection (POI) | The physical location where a carriers connecting circuits interconnect for the purpose of interchanging traffic on the PSTN. | |
| Pooling Administrator | Entity responsible for the administration of the NXX-X blocks within an NPA. | |
| Premature Exhaust | (When referring to NANP):
Premature exhaust means the exhaust of NANP resources
(i.e., requires expansion beyond the 10-digit format)
much sooner than the best industry projections. The NANP
is expected to meet the numbering needs of the
telecommunications industry well into the 21st
century (i.e., a minimum of 25 years). (When referring to NPA): Premature exhaust is when a specific date for NPA relief has been established and the NPA is projected to exhaust prior to that date. (When referring to Rate Center): Premature exhaust is when a specific date for NXX relief has been established and the rate center is projected to exhaust prior to that date. |
|
| Private Networks | Private networks are composed of stations which are not directly accessible from all PSTN stations via the use of NANP E.164 numbers. | |
| PSTN | Public Switched Telephone Network. The PSTN is composed of all transmission and switching facilities and signal processors supplied and operated by all telecommunications common carriers for use by the public. Every station on the PSTN is capable of being accessed from every other station on the PSTN via the use of NANP E.164 numbers. | |
| Rate Center | A geographically specified point used for determining mileage-dependent rates for PSTN calls. | |
| RDBS | The Routing Data Base System (RDBS) contains a complete description of all Local Exchange Companies networks in the NANP Area (except, currently Canada) and pertinent information relating to the networks of other code holders. This provides information for, (1) message routing, (2) common channel signaling call setup routing, and (3) operator service access routing. | |
| Reassignment | Refers to the transfer of a working or assigned NXX from one switching entity/POI to another. | |
| Reserved Blocks | A block that has been identified and set aside by the Pooling Administrator for some specific use or purpose. This block is not available for assignment but neither has it been officially assigned by the Pooling Administrator(s) to an entity. | |
| Service Providers | Any entity that is authorized, as appropriate, by local governmental, state, federal or the NANP Area governmental authorities to provide communications services to the public. | |
| Switching Entity | An electromechanical or electronic system for connecting lines to lines, lines to trunks, or trunks to trunks for the purpose of originating/terminating PSTN calls. A single switching system may handle several central office codes. | |
| TBUS | Thousand Block Utilization Survey (TBUS) is conducted ????annually by the Pooling Administrator from direct input received from Block Holders in order to monitor block utilization, projected exhaust of NXXs and demand for new NXXs to provide block relief. The purpose of TBUS is to provide an annual overall view of both present and projected block (NXX-X) utilization for each NXX in the NPA. | |
| Technical Requirement | A limitation of the Point of Interconnection or Switching Entity where an existing block and/or numbers cannot be used for designated network routing and/or rating of PSTN calls. | |
| Terminating Point Master | The TPM contains all the active NPA and CO code (NXX) combinations in the NANP and for each of these points the following is provided: Major Vertical and Horizontal coordinates, LATA/LATA-like code, LATA subzone code, RAO code, place and state, province or country name abbreviation, and time zone indicator. | |
| TNs Available for Assignment | Telephone numbers within existing blocks (NXX-X) which are immediately available for assignment to subscriber access lines or their equivalents within a switching entity/POI. | |
| TNs Unavailable for Assignment | Telephone numbers within existing blocks (NXX-X) which are neither "Working Telephone Numbers" as defined below, nor available for new assignments as working telephone numbers within a switching entity/POI. Examples include numbers required for maintenance testing, numbers reserved for specific customers or specific services, disconnected numbers on intercept, pending connects or disconnects, etc. | |
| Working Telephone Numbers (TNs) | Telephone numbers within existing blocks (NXX-X) which are assigned to working subscriber access lines or their equivalents, e.g., direct inward dialing trunks, paging numbers, special services, temporary local directory numbers (TLDNs), etc., within a switching entity/POI. | |